Mitchell Irwin Sentenced on Domestic Violence Charge

[To watch a video of the sentencing, click here.] On March 23, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. Ann Arbor 15th District Court Judge Miriam A. Perry sentenced former Michigan state senator Mitchell L. Irwin on a single charge of domestic violence, a misdemeanor. Irwin is the father of Michigan state senator Jeff Irwin (D-Ann Arbor). Mitchell Irwin pled no contest. In pleading no contest, the defendant admits to the truth of the facts alleged in the indictment. Such a plea prevents a guilty plea from being used against a defendant in any subsequent legal proceeding.

Irwin, who appeared at the hearing via Zoom, sat in a darkened bedroom, his face obscured by a blue surgical mask.

In Michigan, a first time charge of domestic violence carries a maximum sentence of 93 days in jail and a fine of up to $500. Irwin, who appeared at the hearing via Zoom, sat in a darkened bedroom, his face obscured by a blue surgical mask. Judge Perry sentenced the 68-year-old self-employed, former state senator to 93 days in jail with credit for two days served. The judge then suspended the remaining jail time under the auspices of a sentencing agreement. Irwin was sentenced under the auspices of a Cobb’s Evaluation.

A Cobb’s Evaluation is unique to Michigan and often referred to as a Cobb’s Agreement. Simply put, a Cobbs Evaluation is plea bargaining that involves the participation of the judge. The prosecutor and the defense attorney agree on what charges the defendant will plead to. The judge will indicate if he or she accepts the plea bargain and what the possible sentence for the defendant will be (called a “preliminary evaluation of sentence”). In this case, County Prosecutor Eli Savit agreed to offer Mitchell Irwin a suspended sentence, rather than push for jail time.

In order to fulfill the sentencing agreement, Irwin is required to successfully complete six months of probation, undergo and pay for regular and random drug/alcohol testing, abstain from keeping alcohol in his household, refrain from being around others who use drugs and alcohol, and participate in therapy. He is restrained from harassing, stalking, or threatening his wife or anyone else. The judge ordered him not to assault Jennifer Eyer or anyone else, and to have only consentual contact with his wife. Irwin, who in Court records declared his income as $150,000, was ordered to pay fines and costs of $425 and a fee of $240 for probation oversight. He is also forbidden from possessing any firearms.

Jen Eyer is an Ann Arbor City Council member (D-Ward 4). On January 13, 2021 Court records released to the public show that Mitchell Irwin was arrested for “assault or assault and battery” against Eyer. He was released on a $5,000 personal recognizance bond. County Prosecutor Eli Savit has instituted a policy whereby most domestic violence perpetrators are expected to abide by no contact orders. One was issued to Mitchell Irwin.

Two weeks after his arraignment, records show that Irwin’s attorney scheduled a hearing to amend the terms of his bond. “Amend bond entered 1/13/21 as follows: Allow consentual contact with alleged victim – Jen Eyer (including children).” County Prosecutor Savit did not lodge an objection, and the request was granted by Judge Perry.

It was Eyer’s adult daughter who called 911 and who summoned police to the home, resulting in Irwin’s arrest and two-day stay in jail.

Prior to passing sentence, Judge Perry asked Mitchell Irwin if he had anything to say. He replied, “Well, Your Honor, I’m grateful to receive a deferred sentence and will fulfill all of the requirements dutifully.”

Irwin’s lawyer Joe Simon released a statement after the hearing in which the lawyer said: “My client deeply regrets this isolated incident. That evening, he drank in a manner that was out of character. He pushed his wife out of the way and she fell, and her daughter called the police. He apologizes and takes full responsibility. They are committed to strengthening their marriage and family.”

Eyer, when asked to comment, said Simon’s statement referred to her, as well, and declined to add anything. When asked to comment by a reporter from online newspaper Advance Michigan, Eyer similarly refused to comment, referring the reporter to the Executive Director of Washtenaw County Safe House, a shelter for battered persons and their children. At Irwin’s sentencing hearing, Eyer did not provide an victim impact statement which is always solicited by the Court, and taken into consideration when handing down sentence.

After sentencing, Judge Perry wished Irwin luck. Criminal justice research shows that luck will have nothing to do with whether Mitchell Irwin will succeed.

Research shows that in Michigan, 78 percent of those convicted of domestic violence crimes are white and 85 percent are men. Recidivism is high. Three-fifths of individuals convicted of domestic violence are rearrested within two years—and 67 percent of this group are rearrested for another domestic violence offense. While most of these offenders are age 35 or younger, a sizable minority are age 46 or above. Judge Perry sentenced Irwin to six-months of probation, including therapy. In California, all domestic violence offenders who receive a probation sentence participate in a one-year batter intervention program (BIP). BIPs have been shown to be effective in the reduction of recidivism as compared to traditional sanctions including arrest, probation, and incarceration.

Another potential way to curb the high recidivism rates for domestic violence offenders are restorative justice programs. Rather than a focus on just punishment for a crime (probation with jail time threatened), or even treatment for the offender (BIP), the idea behind restorative justice is to bring in the perspective of the victim and focus on the harm caused by the crime. The typical restorative justice program brings together victim and offender in a conversation, with a mediator or group of volunteers and supporters, to discuss how the offender can make amends and be held accountable.

At the March 23 hearing, Judge Perry scheduled Mitchell Irwin for a review hearing on April 21. At that time, she will hear from the Prosecutor, probation, review therapy progress reports, drug/alcohol testing records, review Irwin’s criminal record for any further complaints, and then decide whether to allow him to continue on with a suspended sentence. If Irwin fails to meet the terms of his probation, Judge Perry could immediately impose the jail sentence of 93 days with two days already served and a fine of up to $500.

41 Comments
  1. Steve Pierce says

    A plea of no contest means that you neither admit to nor deny committing the alleged crime. While it is not an admission of guilt, there are ramifications for pleading no contest. In fact, in Michigan, a no-contest plea has exactly the same effect as a guilty plea would.

    1. Mo Advocacy says

      No contest does not have the same effect. This is all mis-information. Please educate yourselves. As I mentioned, and I am an expert on the subject. I am a woman who has studied and been through the courts system… this cannot be equated to a bar fight by cis-white men. NO CONTEST MEANS THIS CAN BE EXPUNGED FROM THE RECORD. IT LOOKS BETTER TO THE JUDGES AND THE COURTS. It is a lot worse to be the asshole who beat up your spouse and hire a law team to prove that it was justified.

  2. Mo Advocacy says

    How can you all not see that Irwin’s support of the Decarceration movement may have to do with this. He has a direct interest in protecting men like his father. Getting re-elected is easy when appealing to certain populations. Patricia Lesko we NEED our community to discuss this.

    1. Justin Kahl says

      This is ridiculous…. Now you’re arguing that us disagreeing with the with the legal interpretation of the article which is wrong is somehow advocating for the crime.
      … And though for the above reasons it’s in no way related, the decarceration movement aims to tackle the fact that the US has one of the highest global percentage of it’s population sitting in jail and for petty crimes and doing time like 7 years like selling a dime bag of weed (not real criminals).
      Idk why the son is your target in all of this. This is now jumping to conspiracy talk. You literally just passed the deeds of the father onto the son. That’s prejudice. As somebody who had their parents divorce over a domestic abuse case, that’s complete BS.

    2. The Ann Arbor Independent Editorial Team says

      Mo Advocacy I think you are discussing this quite directly.

  3. Justin Kahl says

    Yeah, this article opens itself up for a defamation suit in a lot of places. It seems unnecessarily long and misinforming to ruin his career but he’s retired. The only career it would hurt is his wife or son that they unnecessarily mention. They also didn’t need to give away the families home address in the other article. The media had been pretty irresponsible with these stories.

    1. Mike Payette says

      Justin Kahl I let them know.

    2. The Ann Arbor Independent Editorial Team says

      Justin Kahl You must be an expert in defamation trapped in the career of a project engineer. 🙂 With that in mind, please provide proof of your assertion. You will, of course, link to the appropriate Michigan statutes. Perhaps take a moment and differentiate for us between public and private individuals and the bar of proof. Here’s more information on defamation: https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/proving-fault-actual-malice-and-negligence

  4. Mike Payette says

    The article is entirely wrong at the beginning: in a no contest plea, the defendant does not admit to the truth of the facts. And there are rarely facts with any government operatives/ operations I might add.

  5. Jeff Hayner says

    IDK how far preferential treatment went in this case, but I will note that this incident (or possibly others) was not returned in the FOIA Ryan Stanton recently filed for all police reports associated with Council Members addresses since 2018. Ms. Eyer’s address was in there, the same address listed in these records shown above. Why was that not part of the FOIA results?

  6. The Ann Arbor IIndependent Editorial Team says

    Mike Payette Judicial sentencing disparities in our county are significant. This is from CREW:
    “The data startled us. It revealed wide racial disparities in prosecutors’ decisions impacting such things as who was charged, the average number of charges and the average number of convictions per case.” Read more here: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.freep.com/amp/3473374001

  7. Justin Kahl says

    Mo Advocacy no it’s not a barfight; however, it’s the same charge and the offer for the charge is the same. We’re talking about whether this is consistent with legal consequences in Ann Arbor, nothing about morality.

    1. Mo Advocacy says

      Justin Kahl can’t you see I am talking about legal consequences…

  8. Mo Advocacy says

    I have directly shared my experiences and how government has failed us. Please quit saying I am filled with hate, I want to generate change and shed light on these things. I am not being reactionary. This is a very PC ad-hominem attack and coded racial language. I am not just an angry woman.

    1. Mike Payette says

      Mo Advocacy good luck.

  9. Mo Advocacy says

    Mike Payette quit declaring you are an expert on the matter. Please defer to women, we know gender-based sexual violence. I have direct experiences. Thank you.

    1. Mike Payette says

      Mo Advocacy make that comment make some sense please. Your comment seems a woe’s me , selfish and attacking. Sorry. I know the governments which is as important if not more important. Gender based murders take place because of government reactions to these types of things, that the people allow and love, with often hate/filled hearts and reactionary retaliations.

  10. Justin Kahl says

    I actually agree with Mike. I’ve had a few friends with like barfight assaults and this is the standard Ann Arbor standard. The fines are a little low but he chose to pay bond and that gets taken into account most times.

    1. Mo Advocacy says

      Justin Kahl this is not a barfight assault.

  11. Geoffrey Henny says

    If this guy had been black and poor they would have thrown the book at him. We have two justice systems in this country. Even in our town.

    1. Mike Payette says

      Geoffrey Henny hello sir. You are wrong in this regard. And FYI I am an expert on the matter. So please take no offense.

  12. Mo Advocacy says

    It is not simply a game of chess, or coffee table conversation. I am not a filter on your profile picture…or a sign in your yard. We are talking about our lives here. I am not just a meme. I am not a dog. Why are you all trying to act like you have sympathy for the family and want to respect their privacy? This is up for public discussion. It is time to be transparent.

  13. Mo Advocacy says

    Mike Payette & Eric Sturgis clearly the situation is terrible. I hope I laid it out pretty clearly. Feel free to refute any evidence I have provided, other than a personal attack on my deeply painful story. I am not excited to share these things with you all. I am just keeping us in touch with reality vs. the lie that Ann Arbor tells. It is not as liberal or as championing of BIPOC or women as it tries to appear. It does not have the best schools in the country…and if we are leaders…How do schools look in Detroit? Rural Tennessee or down south?

  14. Eric Sturgis says

    The no alcohol in the house or being around alcohol and drug testing is a very positive in this horrendous situation.

    1. Mike Payette says

      Eric Sturgis what horrendous situation may I ask. And please explain. Thanks.

  15. Mo Advocacy says

    “This bill today is just going to put more and more people on the registry who don’t deserve to be there, who don’t belong there, and who really water down any effect that the registry has to promote public safety.”

    Irwin says it should be up to judges to decide who is a potential threat and should be placed on the registry.

  16. Mo Advocacy says

    Ad-hominem attacks will get us nowhere, educate yourselves about what is going on in MI. In our community.

  17. Mo Advocacy says

    Victims have direct support services provided such as therapies and pharmaceutical experimentation on our minds. How else do studies at institutions like U of M get funded? Our society wouldn’t have ACE studies based off of trauma, or the newest PTSD medication…if we actually generated change. I want you all to see how these folks have politically organized and are lobbying. A lot of liberals donate to the ACLU. Do you know what your $$ is going to? Why aren’t we supported with legislation and policy. Why is grant money thrown at a system that profits from our pain? https://tftr.narsol.org/

  18. Anne O'Brien says

    Mike Payette Has anyone ever planted child porn on your computer?

    1. Mike Payette says

      Anne O’Brien what is the point of your question? And no, not that I know of.
      I’ll tell you what if you as a future juror and you pass this along to others, create hung jury for these defendants when able, so they have a second trial. Then throwing the book at them so to say could be legitimate. Let’s work on that as a populace. And to try to cover for the government that is not a rule of law, WE THE PEOPLE.

  19. Mike Payette says

    Anne O’Brien and I guess I would like to add, there is no credibility with our systems of rule so we don’t know if anyone they say is caught with child porn even had child porn, and we don’t know if a government planted said child porn. Ever.

  20. Anne O'Brien says

    Mike Payette So if an adult is caught with child porn, what should happen to them?

    1. Mike Payette says

      He should not be subjected to abuse, lies, crimes, lawlessness and / or violence by those claiming to be a rule of law. Nor should we as the citizenry allow this, what happens 100% of the time in our CJS and American Jurisprudence. That is my point. I could add to directly answer you if you feel it necessary. I want to educate and enlighten us all. And cordially and professional do so.

  21. Mike Payette says

    Anne O’Brien one more thing: Try to consider all the lies and exaggerations that do happen by alleged victims, and then imagine a lying tyrannical and abusive and / or violent government destroying a defenseless defendant, innocent or not. But with overkill too often. Thank you.

  22. Mike Payette says

    Anne O’Brien hello. Smart people who care about people and know life’s realities and the abuse by lawless governments. I can tell you that without reading it.

  23. Mo Advocacy says

    Democratic state Representative Jeff Irwin was one of only three votes against it. He admits it’s not a popular position to take. https://www.michiganradio.org/post/state-house-approves-bill-add-more-people-sex-offender-registry

    1. Anne O'Brien says

      And why would a person ever vote against something like this?

  24. Jeff Hayner says

    I guess the most interesting things in the Michigan Advance story were the 13 points in the Defense’s request for discovery, and Eyer’s referral to Safehouse in response to a question. Also how we’ve had all sorts of court hearings but it is now just newsworthy, and of course not by MLive.

    1. The Ann Arbor Independent Editorial Team says

      The Defense attorney asked for pretty standard materials with an eye toward going to trial. That Irwin pled no contest kept him from a trial. As for MLive, I believe that the City withheld the police report of the Irwin arrest, as well as the 911 call from the contents of a FOIA submitted by MLive. I’m not willing to say that the police officer who handles FOIAs for the City did anything wrong or made a mistake. This leave the City Attorney’s office whose staffers review all FOIAs with redaction duties. Someone made what amounts to an enormous mistake or tried to cover up public records that documented a serious crime committed by the husband of a City Council member.

  25. Billy John says

    She included contact with her kids in the bond amendment? JESUS. No victim impact statement. This is not good.

  26. Dave D. says

    No apology when the judge asks if he has anything to say. This plus the mask and glasses and darkened room say everything that needs to be said. This guy thinks no one can see what he’s doing. Creepy in the extreme. Either they split up or we’ll be seeing more of old Mitch down the road.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.