Five Council Members Launch An Unprecedented Effort To Curb Cronyism

by P.D. Lesko

“We keep seeing the same names.”

“It’s like there is some ‘professional class’ of board appointees.”

“We need to draw from a larger group of citizens.”

“I want to open the door for a closer examination of the appointment and confirmation process.”

photoSo the debate went on at Ann Arbor City Council’s May 13th meeting over John Hieftje’s proposed appointment of former Ann Arbor Planning Commission member Eric Mahler to a five year appointment on the Board of the Ann Arbor Transportation Authority. Ward 1 Council member Sabra Briere (left) repeatedly chastised her Council colleagues for engaging in debate; the first time she was visibly embarrassed after realizing that it was, indeed, the appropriate moment for a discussion. Briere has earned the nickname “Hieftje-lite” among several of her Council colleagues, and has lost the confidence and support of many of the city’s neighborhood activists on whose financial support she could once count.

The debate marked a sharp turn away from what has been over a decade of Council’s rubber stamping of John Hieftje’s proposed political appointees without discussion.

In an April 2013 post A2Politico wrote:

That Hieftje wants to replace Nacht with Eric Mahler should come as no surprise. Mahler, it could be argued, has done enough for Ann Arbor having played his part in crafting the seriously flawed A2D2 Design Guidelines/Zoning against which the public is now railing. At the end of March 2013, in response to public backlash aimed at a parcel which Mahler (among others) voted to zone D1 (for dense development), City Council decided to conduct a review of the D1 zoning guidelines. Mahler and the Planning Commission, in essence, were asked to review their own work—work which they believed had been done correctly in the first place.

There are about 400 Ann Arbor citizens who serve on boards and commissions, according to city records. About one-fifth of those citizens serve on more than one board or commission. Below, you’ll find a list of several of Ann Arbor’s busiest citizens, each of whom have been appointed to serve on multiple city boards and commissions:

Bonnie Bona: City Panning Commission, Downtown Zoning Steering Committee, Ad Hoc, North Huron Vision Task Force, Street Art Fairs, Mayor’s Committee on

Roger Hewitt: Community Security & Public Space Task Force, Downtown Development Authority, Downtown Zoning Steering Committee, Ad Hoc, Local Officers’ Compensation Commission, Local Officers’ Compensation Commission

Anthony Ramirez: Building Authority, Cable Communications Commission, Housing and Human Services Advisory Board

Kirk Westphal: City Panning Commission, Design Guidelines Taskforce, Environmental Commission (Planning Commission Rep.)

Ironically, in 2004 after Democrats had won all of the seats on City Council, then Ward 2 Council member Joan Lowenstein assured the media that a Democratic super majority would in no way squelch robust debate. The next nine years showed her to be flat out wrong. Not only were political appointees confirmed without discussion, but the same political appointees often played musical chairs, moving from one board or commission to another. The shallow gene pool from which Hieftje has repeatedly drawn has made for some Deliverance quality drama.

David Nacht and Jesse Bernstein are being allowed to quietly “retire” from the AATA Board after a costly debacle in which the two men tried to shove a $500 million dollar county-wide transit scheme dreamed up by Hieftje down the throats of unwilling county residents and pols. Almost as soon as the AATA Board launched the boondoggle, which would have required communities to tax themselves in order to pay for things like the Canton Flyer and bus service between Ann Arbor Detroit Metropolitian Airport, elected officials of surrounding cities and townships opted out of the plan. The result was a humiliating October 2012 vote by the Ann Arbor City Council in which Hieftje was forced to watch Ann Arbor opt out of AATA’s county-wide transit plan.

In January 2012, Ward 3 Council member Stephen Kunselman (right), while speaking about the transit scheme to the Ypsilanti City Council, called Hieftje’s ideas “a little beyond reality. Kunselman included in the category of transit ideas that are unrealistic, “commuter rail to Brighton and Dearborn.”

Last night, as Hieftje argued AATA Board members had asked for a lawyer to be appointed, Kunselman had a similarly direct comment: “I don’t know why the AATA Board needs a lawyer. After the fiasco in December—having a lawyer (Nacht) on the Board didn’t help with that.”

Kunselman, who is opposed in the August Democratic primary election by Hieftje-backed candidate Julie Grand, former Chair of the Park Advisory Commission, has been a vocal supporter of closer Council oversight of the Board of the Downtown Development Authority. In addition, as a member of the Council’s Audit Committee, he has supported closer scrutiny of the DDA’s finances. These are both actions for which he has been relentlessly attacked by Hieftje and his fellow members of the DDA Board. They have accused Kunselman of playing politics.

Sabra Briere, in emails to the DDA’s Director Susan Pollay, emails which turned up in the local news blog AnnArbor.com, accused Kunselman of playing politics, as well. Briere who supported Kunselman’s efforts in public by voting in favor of a proposed resolution to rein in the DDA Board, was caught by AnnArbor.com counseling Pollay via email on how best to neutralize Kunselman’s efforts.

In emails turned over to A2Politico in response to a recent Freedom of Information Act request, Kunselman was clearly irked at Briere. Kunselman retorted via email that he found Briere’s behind-the-back attacks “unethical” and mean-spirited. He writes, “Why should anyone trust you when your sincerity is questionable?”

Briere writes to him via email: “Um…Not certain what you mean. The tone is unfortunate, but also pretty certain I didn’t say anything you haven’t said.”

As the debate on Eric Mahler’s appointment progressed Hieftje became visibly uncomfortable, as did Hieftje Hive Mind drone Sabra Briere. In a tone that vacillated between preachy and exasperated, Briere lectured her Council colleagues on their need to vote on the qualifications of the candidate presented to them. Ward 5 Council member Mike Anglin kicked off the debate by questioning why Hieftje had bypassed the application of a very qualified member of the disabled community, an individual with ample board experience, as well as experience advising AATA.

“This is an opportunity to appoint someone who will bring a different perspective to the discussion,” said Anglin. “The handicapped are a group of people who use the bus.”

photoWard 1 Council member Sumi Kailasapthy (right), whose name, incredibly, Hieftje and city staff member Craig Hupy still can’t pronounce correctly, either because of sheer ignorance, or perhaps because it has too many vowels, spoke about her disabled son’s use of AATA, and agreed with Anglin. She went on to point out that Hieftje was playing a game of musical chairs in moving certain people from one city board to another.

“We’re seeing the same names over and over,” said Kailsapathy.

Ward 2 Council member Sally Hart Petersen rapped Hieftje over the knuckles at one point in the debate for his use of the word “handicapped.” Hieftje, in turn, blamed Council member Mike Anglin—whose use of the word, Hieftje explained, had preceded his own. Petersen, undeterred, corrected him again. It was a welcome effort to be respectful of a community against which Hieftje has waged a political war for over a decade. He has done so through his “repurposing” of AATA’s resources away from local transit, and through a refusal to replace 100 units of affordable, supportive housing which were lost when the old YMCA was torn down years ago.

Then, when Hieftje claimed that Eric Mahler “represented” a particular minority community, Ward 5 Council member Chuck Wapehoski pointed out that no one individual could represent an entire community.

Kailasapthy, Petersen, Ward 2 Council member Jane Lumm, Kunselman and Anglin pressed Hieftje to withdraw Mahler’s name and appoint, instead, the other applicant whose materials they had been given. Hieftje, with help from Sabra Briere, repeatedly argued that Mahler’s was the only name before Council.

In response, Sally Petersen went a step further by making it clear to Hieftje that the debate concerning the appointment of Eric Mahler should be taken to mean that “we’re not comfortable with the appointment and confirmation process as it stands. I want to open the door to that discussion. We need to examine this process.”

In an effort to draw attention to the fact that David Nacht, so some critics claim, had outstayed his welcome on the AATA Board with a 10 year term of appointment, Mike Anglin grilled Hieftje on whether Mahler would serve “a five year term.” Hieftje, shocked, was speechless for a moment and then assured Anglin that Mahler’s appointment was, indeed, for a single five year term. Hieftje was also asked if there would be other openings on the AATA Board in the near future.

These kinds of questions suggest, perhaps, that more “retirements” are going to be demanded by Council members from the city’s boards and commissions.

Hieftje was similarly flummoxed when Stephen Kunselman suggested that there would be room on the AATA Board for Mahler and the other applicant. All that needed to be done was to remove city staffer Eli Cooper whose presence on the AATA Board has been questioned by many as inappropriate staff control of a citizen board.

“We have a member of the AATA Board who doesn’t even live in Ann Arbor,” said Kunselman. “This person could be asked to step down to make room for both Mr. Mahler and the other applicant,” reasoned Kunselman.

Hieftje, tight-lipped, was literally speechless. It was Sabra Briere who came to Hizzoner’s rescue suggesting that Kunselman was over-reaching in his efforts to do anything except vote on the name before him.

“I thought Kunselman’s was a perfectly acceptable compromise,” said an AATA staffer who asked not to be named. “Eli Cooper has no business serving on the AATA Board. Neither did (Sue) McCormick. Cooper should be removed regardless.”

The appointment of Eric Mahler was not the only one that prompted questions. When Hieftje informed Council that he proposed to reappoint all of the members of the Downtown Citizens Advisory Council (CAC) Board, some of whose appointments had expired in 2008, Sally Hart Petersen asked why there were “so many couples” being proposed.

Hieftje feigned ignorance about his own appointments. “I really don’t know,” he said. “I’ve never been to a meeting of this group.”

Sabra Briere offered up the ludicrous explanation that appointing couples to a group that advises the Downtown Development Authority on downtown development and TIF plans is an opportunity for the couples to spend time together.

“Well, I think it’s a ‘If you go, I go,’ sort of thing,” suggested Briere, seriously. “It an opportunity for the couples to spend time together.”

The CAC has no student, minority, or young professional members and has had none since 2001. All of the appointments to the CAC expired in October 2012, but the former Chair appeared in public on numerous occasions between November 2012 and May 2013 claiming to speak on behalf of the “CAC Board,” “downtown residents” and “the members of the CAC.”

The lengthy, frank debate about the appointment of Eric Mahler ended in a 6-5 vote in favor of seating Mahler with Briere, Taylor, Teall, Higgins, Warpehoski and Hieftje voting in favor of playing Hieftje’s game of musical chairs.

John Hieftje won the battle, but he may be six months away from completely losing the war.

Unpopular Ward 4 Council member Marcia Higgins is being challenged by labor lawyer Jack Eaton, who came just 20 votes shy of unseating Ward 4 5-term incumbent Margie Teall in August 2012. Sabra Briere, meanwhile, in a March 2013 email exchange with Stephen Kunselman writes, “And I’ve never been concerned about a primary opponent.” In fact, at one point in the meeting last night Briere, who wants to run for mayor when Hieftje steps down, insinuated that she’d still be on City Council five years down the road.

Next November, should Eaton win, John Hieftje would lose face more 5-6/4-7 votes and find his board and commission appointments voted down on a regular basis. Such a scenario would mean that the pervasive cronyism in local government could begin to be curtailed (or even reversed) for the first time since John Hieftje took office in 2000 and in 2003 put his political pal David DeVarti on the Local Officers Compensation Committee. In 2003, DeVarti voted to increase the salary for the mayor’s part-time job from $28,000 per year to $40,000 per year. In 2004, Hieftje reappointed DeVarti to sit on the Board of the DDA.

16 Comments
  1. Mark Koroi says

    The City Council meeting last night saw Al McWilliams’ name withdrawn from consideration for a seat on the DDA when he was expected to be voted on by City council members for appointment.

    It appeared that McWilliams’ mayoral nomination was about to be rejected by City Council – chiefly due to intensive vocal opposition by Steve Kunselman. It also appeared that Anglin, Petersen and Kailasapathy were leaning against confirming McWilliams to the DDA and Hizzoner withdrew Mc Williams’ name from consideration to avoid a debacle.

    Ms. Kailasapathy complained to the Mayor that other DDA applicants were not disclosed to City Council and she wanted to review those as well.

    It was a stunning rebuke to the Mayor in what usually in the past was a rubber-stamp process.

    The Hieftje Machine is crumbling………………….

  2. Mark Koroi says

    If someone wants to do a nice investigation it would be of the AATA’s litigation of the ACLU suit brought in the name of Blaine Coleman.

    The Ann Arbor Chronicle had discovered that the AATA spent over $6,900.00 in just the first month’s of litigation to keep an ad off a bus. That litigation has been pending now for 18 months with no end in sight and the ACLU has won some victories including the granting of a preliminary injuction in United States District Court.

    The AATA has a $50,000.00 legal cost deductible with its liability insurance carrier. The AATA has hired two law firms, Maddin Hauser Wartell Roth, as well as Jerry Lax’s firm to defend the case and also has retained the sevices of a $250.00 per hour expert witness, Aaron Ahuvia, a U-M business professor.

    Dave Askins has raised the fact AATA board member David Nacht is an ACLU member and this presents potential conflict of interest issues.

    Someone should submit a FOIA request on the records of the AATA to discover how much has ben expended to keep a $1,700 ad off city buses.

    1. A2 Politico says

      @Mark, sometimes it’s worth the money. Aaron Ahuvia (whom I know, along with his wife Aura, kids and parents) is a faculty member at the University of Michigan Dearborn. What, exactly, he is doing as an “expert” witness for AATA is the better question. This is from his bio: “Widely regarded as a leading authority on the psychology of love in non-interpersonal contexts, such as consumers’ love of products and brands, he is also well known for his research on income, consumption, and happiness.” How this relates to AATA’s efforts to fend off advertising is worth the effort to find out. Ahuvia, like Nacht, is Jewish, as is Jerry Lax. Lax and Nacht attend the same synagogue (the one we attend) and the Ahuvias belong to the Reconstructionist group in town. Jewish Geography aside, I’m curious what the connection is between Aaron and AATA’s lawsuit.

      1. Mark Koroi says

        @A2Politico:

        Aaron Ahuvia as submitted sworn statements on how he believes the proposed ad will be perceived by consumers and affect their respective attitudes toward ridership.

        I have seen Dr. Ahuvia lecture at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy on the issue of negotiations for the creation of a Palestinian state. The subject of his lecture are how Palestinians and Israeli Jews perceive each other and how that affects peace negotiations.

        1. A2 Politico says

          @Mark, well then, he’s taking about the potential the ad has to damage the AATA brand, as it were. It’s a stretch. Jesse Bernstein and David Nacht damaged the AATA brand within the county by trying to jam a county-wide transit boondoggle down the throats of taxpayers and pols more than any ad could, I think.

          1. Aimee Smith says

            Aaron Ahuvia is an active Zionist.

            He certainly has a political agenda in the dispute over the AATA ads at issue.

            He is part of the damage control wing of the Zionist movement. (Kind of like drone-striking Obama is in terms of protecting US imperialism and corporate rule. But he wrings his hands for the Guantanamo hunger strikers and welcomes dissent, so that makes it ok to assassinate people and keep Guantanamo open, right?) The goal of that wing is to appear to be concerned about peace and justice in order to protect the inherently racist state of Israel which was created via forced expulsions and theft. It is a hard sell for Israel to claim itself as a justified haven for a persecuted people as it continues to this day to persecute the indigenous people of that land. Ahuvia has served on the national board of Brit Tzedek. The Brit Tzedek/J Street movement is about attempting to rescue as much as it can of a state that codifies privilege for Jews at the expense of indigenous inhabitants from its unsustainable public relations nightmare. The AIPAC-type wing thinks they can get away with it indefinitely.

            I am being terse and rather direct, only to save time. One might glance at Ahuvia’s work and think he cares about universal rights, but a closer examination of his framing and priorities tells another story. For example, he declares it is not unjust to require Palestinians to have a demilitarized state. Most Palestinians, after experiencing genocidal treatment from Israel, might wonder why they are supposed to surrender the right to self-defense whereas Israel is never asked to do so. (US politicians always speak of Israeli peace and security and Palestinian peace as if the racist double standard of limited rights for Palestinians is a foregone conclusion.)

            To sum up, Ahuvia definitely has a dog in the fight w.r.t. the AATA bus ads. And he makes $250 per hour of our tax money to pursue his passion of protecting Israel from negative pr? How sad, yet unsurprising.

            1. Kerry D says

              Incidentally, the trio of Nacht, Ahuvia, and Lax all attend Temple Beth Emeth.

              I believe the scope of the concern is even if one is for the defense of the ACLU suit to place Boycott Israel ads on city buses, why should both Jerry Lax and Aaron Ahuvia be getting paid oodles of monies via public funds to supplement the legal defense of the case by the law firm appointed by the city’s liability insurance carrier?

              Ahuvia is being compensated at the rate of $250.00 per hour to give the opinion, in essence, that the Coleman ad will draw negative reactions by certain consumers and discourage ridership.

              Why do we need Jerry Lax to act as co-counsel to the law firm hired by the liability carrier? What does he add to the case?

              Lax is a former Ann Arbor City Attorney who is deeply involved in Jewish issues – often being mentioned in articles in the Washtenaw Jewish News.

              It was recently revealed that the City of Dearborn paid out $300,000.00 in settlement with taxpayers’ monies to the “Christian missionaries” that were hassled by city officials over their appearance at the Arab International Festival.

              This situation is no different except the Jewish community is the group throwing around its political weight in Ann Arbor to silence Free Speech as opposed to the Muslims in Dearborn.

              Ahuvia and Lax are making “big bucks” over this dispute while the necessity of their respective services are questionable. The Jewish community in Ann Arbor is the primary force that opposes the message of Coleman and has spearheaded the Ann Arbor Transportation Authority to defend this lawsuit.

              Nacht is a “golden boy” in the Ann Arbor Jewish community that had previously been grooomed to run for Congress – Coleman is viewed as a left-winger that merits its scorn. A victory by Coleman over the AATA will be vindication for Coleman and his views.

              Coleman in 2007 wasgrabbed by his shirt collar and dragged by a police officer to the police HQ for booking after holding up a placard in City Council chambers criticizing Israel. The Mayor personally ordered Coleman removed. This would have never occurred if Coleman’s placard had not criticized Israel.

              Hiefje was present at the Jewish Federation’s celebration ofthe 60th anniversary of Israel’s founding. He craves the support and adulation of the local Jewish community just like Mayor Jack O’Reilly walks on eggs for Dearborn’s Arab community. Not that either mayor gives a hoot about Middle Eastern politics or the people that come from there – its all about political contributions and votes.

              We need to have citizens appearing at public commentary period before the AATA to complain about this situation.

  3. money&buildings says

    @Dave D.

    And yet, Sally Petersen voted in favor of appointing Eric Mahler to the AATA.

  4. Dustin Hoffman says

    Ray Detter is hopping mad over this. Saw him at council and oh man he was practically spitting he is so pissed off. Red in the face I’m having a stroke mad. All I can saw is that you must be doing something right!!

    1. Mark Koroi says

      Ray Detter was there briefly, but I did not see him present when the issue of the his re-appointment came up.

      I was present on May 6th and saw several citizens approach him about the A2Politico aricle about the expiration of his seat and Ray indicated that he considered himself the chairman until his appointment is renewed. He did not seem angry on May 6th, but I cannot tell you what his mood was like on May 13th when he was in City Council.

      I told the City Council during Public Commentary on the 13th that I opposed his re-appointment to the CAC.

      1. Dustin Hoffman says

        He considers himself the Chair after his appt expired? Does he consider himself the Queen of England, as well? This is hysterical! Either there are term limits or there aren’t. Detter served for 28 years. That’s enough already. There are other people who live downtown with new ideas and opinions about the DDA and its work.

        1. Mark Koroi says

          There need to be some kind of investigation as to how these appointments expired and the effect of these expirations on resolutions that may have been relied upon by other entities e.g. the DDA and City Council that the CAC is required under state law to give.

          There is also the issue of the minutes not being in compliance with the Open Meetings Act. Detter as chairman should have known his duties and the entities receiving his minutes should have recognized that they were non-compliant. WE have no idea who was present at these meetings or what all was discussed. This is unaccepatable.

          I was happy to hear from Sally Hart Peterson the point that we have husband-wife teams that were appointed to the CAC. This is unprecedented. What commission in any city in America has husband and wives serve on the same board. It is ludicrous!

          The CAC needs to be cleaned up – that clean-up starts with Ray Detter being figuratively tossed out on his ear.

          Citizens should be e-mailing their City Council members to clean house at the CAC.

  5. Anonymous says

    When I saw this I thought I was dreaming! Actual council debate? Is this Ann Arbor? It’s about time. Keep it coming, this is exactly what the public expects and the city needs. No more rubberstamp city council. Shame on Sabra Briere for trying to get in the way of what can only be a good change in how our local politicians do business.

  6. Dave D. says

    Thanks to the Council members involved for the effort. It’s an uphill battle to change entreched political habits. Sally Petersen is right on the money in her comments that the whole process needs to be looked at and overhauled! There is just no good reason to put a guy who has served on one board for literally years on another board as soon as his time on the first board is up. AATA is a mess and needs people from a lot of different walks of life to give input. This article was great! Thanks for telling it like it is.

  7. money&buildings says

    Many thanks for this article. My laugh out loud moment (actually, several minutes)
    came here – regarding why the mayor is appointing so many couples to the CAC:

    “Well, I think it’s a ‘If you go, I go,’ sort of thing,” suggested Briere, seriously. “It an
    opportunity for the couples to spend time together.”

    I will contribute greatly to her opponent’s campaign.

    1. A2 Politico says

      @m&b I was, literally, speechless for a moment when she said it, and then I envisioned the quote in a newspaper ad, or on a political mailer sent by an opponent. It’s a birthday present. Sabra’s the CM who keeps on giving.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.