Let Them Eat Barbecue: Council Members Plan to Use Homeless at Upcoming Meeting to Show “Strong Support” for Library Lot Sale
by Patricia Lesko
As the saying goes, “In a free-market economy, you get what you give. In a state-run economy, you get what you can bribe a politician to give you.” The Ann Arbor Independent was made aware of allegations that members of Ann Arbor City Council are looking for a bribe of sorts from the area’s homeless individuals and a non-profit group that provides food, shelter and transportation to the homeless. The newspaper contacted representatives of the non-profit group and spoke at length to a current member of M.I.S.S.I.O.N.’s Board of Directors and the Board’s former president Brian Durrance.
Multiple individuals with knowledge of the situation and individuals within the homeless community have alleged that Council members made a variety of political and financial promises to M.I.S.S.I.O.N., a small nonprofit that provides a “voice to the homeless,” according to the nonprofit’s mission statement on its tax returns. The group also provides support and services, such as warming shelter space and bus tokens. A “strong showing” of the homeless individuals whom Mission helps is expected to attend the April 17 Council meeting. At the meeting, the homeless will stage a show of support for the sale of the publicly-owned Library Lot parcel for $10 million to the Core Spaces group, and the construction of a “workforce” housing development project on the site. Half of the purchase price, $5 million, will be deposited into the city’s Affordable Housing Fund.
Durrance said that in exchange for the “show of support for the Core Spaces project” at the April 17 Council meeting, M.I.S.S.I.O.N. hopes to get Council members’ support for a tiny house village for the homeless. The Ann Arbor Independent was unable to reach M.I.S.S.I.O.N. founder Caleb Poirier who is said to have been in discussions with Council members related to the “strong showing” of homeless individuals in exchange for zoning accommodations, among other concessions necessary to clear the way for a tiny houses community for the homeless in Ann Arbor. The Ann Arbor Independent has filed a FOIA request for all communications between Poirier and Council members related to the Core Spaces project and the April 17, 2017 Council meeting.
Brian Durrance said that the area’s homeless would benefit from any portion of the $5 million deposited into the Affordable Housing Fund which might be given to local non-profit Avalon Housing. Avalon is building a $10 million 70-unit low-income housing project on Maple Road. Avalon currently owns and operates 173 units of subsidized housing in 15 buildings scattered around Ann Arbor.
While collecting almost $500,000 in city grants and abatements for the development in 2017, Avalon also collected $700,000 in developer’s fees on the project.
The Ann Arbor Housing Commission operates 360 low-income units. The city Housing Commission’s Section 8 Housing waitlist is closed as is its public housing waitlist.
Core Spaces proposes to build a 17-story tower on the parcel. Of the approximately 320 so-called “workforce” housing units to be built, 9-12 percent of the apartments will be rented at between 120 to 150 percent of fair market rent: $922-$1,276 per month. Renters’ incomes, in order to be eligible for those apartments, would be capped at between $31,000-$64,000 per year. Subsidized housing, unlike workforce housing, pegs rents at 30 percent of a renter’s available income. To qualify for low income housing in Ann Arbor a family of four would generally have to earn less than $44,250.
In order to make the sale of the public land and the proposed 50 year lease of 360 parking garage spaces in the the Library Lot parking garage to Chicago developer Core Spaces less of a bitter pill to swallow for angry downtown business owners, concerned environmentalists and residents who would prefer a central park developed, $5 million from the sale of the parcel would be deposited into Ann Arbor’s Affordable Housing Fund. Brian Durrance returned to this point repeatedly, even as he acknowledged none of the $5 million would directly benefit M.I.S.S.I.O.N. The annual income of nonprofit M.I.S.S.I.O.N. has fallen from a high of $144,000 in 2013 to $66,920 in 2015.
Durrance said: “None of our homeless individuals could afford to live in the Core Spaces apartments,” a development project that critics have dubbed a further expansion of Ann Arbor’s “unaffordable housing” stock.
So why feign support at a public meeting for a housing project homeless individuals won’t be able to afford to rent?
“How does this all make me feel? Filthy. Dirty,” Brian Durrance said. “But that’s politics, right?”
What Durrance leaves unsaid is that using the homeless at a City Council meeting to provide political cover for elected officials who want to vote in favor of a controversial development project is politics in Ann Arbor. It’s political theatre in a political environment that Durrance describes as “very conservative.”
“If we support those Council members, maybe they’ll support us,” said Durrance, but it’s a conspiracy theory to believe we’ve been promised money in exchange for our support at the Council meeting.”
What M.I.S.S.I.O.N.’s Board wants is a tiny house community for the homeless.
“These tiny house communities are popping up all over, but you know Ann Arbor,” said Durrance. He points to the fact that eight years after 100 units of low-income housing in the old Y were demolished, those units have yet to be replaced. “I know, right, in ‘progressive’ Ann Arbor?”
Between 2005 and 2009, under former mayor John Hieftje, 30 units of affordable housing were built in Ann Arbor. According to a 2015 HUD analysis of Ann Arbor’s housing market, between 2013 and 2015 1,060 new units of housing were built downtown, 75 percent of which were student luxury apartments. During the same period, in Berkeley, California that city built 500 units of affordable housing annually, a goal set by its City Council and mayor.
In 2009, a year after the 100 units of low-come housing were torn downtown to make way for an empty lot and then a parking lot on the site of the old YMCA on Fifth Ave, across from the Downtown Library, Hiefje and former Ward 1 Council member Sabra Briere announced their commitment to have 60 more units of affordable housing built. The 60 units were not built and local political pundits such as Mark Maynard accuse Ann Arbor City Council of adopting housing strategies that “dump Ann Arbor’s poor in Ypsilanti.”
Tiny Houses for the Homeless on City Land
In 2015, then Ann Arbor City Council Member Stephen Kunselman (D-Ward 3) brought forward a resolution for a tiny house village near downtown on city-owned property at 415 W. Washington St. Embracing a strategy of “Housing First“—the idea that addressing homelessness starts with giving folks a place to live—U.S. cities like Dallas, Detroit, and Portland already have micro home communities for the homeless up and running. There are 10 tiny house villages for homeless individuals in cities across the U.S. including Detroit, Dallas, Nashville, Seattle, Los Angeles, Austin, Fresno and Portland.
Kunselman’s opponent in the August 2015 Democratic primary election, a 21-year-old U-M student named Zach Ackerman (D-Ward 3), opposed the tiny houses for the homeless project.
“Many people see these houses as a solution to the problem of affordable housing, not only for homeless people but for single people and aging adults — people who don’t need all of the amenities a large house offers,” Durrance told The Michigan Daily in 2015. “I think a lot of the technical issues are being worked out across the country in different conversations, and those discussions are now occurring as well here in Ann Arbor.”
Ackerman argued that it would be “dangerous to have people living in 80-square-foot homes in a flood zone.” The U-M student went on to defeat the long-time incumbent Kunselman by a handful of votes in August 2015. (Stephen Kunselman plans to run again for City Council in the August 2017 Democratic primary election.)
Mayor Christopher Taylor, who endorsed Ackerman in the primary, criticized Kunselman’s 2015 proposal to house the homeless and said in June 2015 he didn’t think 415 W. Washington was “the proper location for such an experiment.” Taylor went on to say, “The location of a tiny homes project should be the subject of a careful and deliberative process.”
Taylor told The Michigan Daily in 2015, “There are zoning and building code obstacles in respect to tiny homes. If they can prove to be legally available within the boundaries of state law, we, in Ann Arbor, would be interested in exploring how we could incorporate tiny homes into our affordable housing portfolio.”
M.I.S.S.I.O.N. Board member Sheri Wander says, “What is needed is for City Council and other government officials to be willing to change zoning laws and other things as necessary in order to create these opportunities, and that conversation is just beginning.” Wander went on to say, “I would like to think Ann Arbor could take the models that are out there and expand on them, make them better, and fit our particular community. I think that’s a conversation that should involve many voices both at the political level with politicians and city council, but also, and very importantly, with the people who will benefit most from having another alternative for affordable housing.”
After Kunselman lost his Council seat in 2015, any “careful deliberative process” related to finding a site for a tiny homes community for the homeless in Ann Arbor ended.
Brian Durrance hopes playing politics will reignite the “deliberative process.” It’s a gamble.
$5 Million to “Affordable” Housing in Exchange for “Workforce Housing”
Should City Council sell the Library Lot parcel for $10 million to Core Spaces, half of the purchase price is slated to be deposited into the city’s Affordable Housing Fund. A Housing Commission official said, “A part of that $5 million is expected to be used to improve the city’s present low-income and affordable housing.”
It’s this money for the Affordable Housing Fund that Council member Zach Ackerman and others on Council focus on when arguing in favor of the Core Spaces proposal. While Ackerman has said the $5 million could be used “to support more affordable housing developments in the city,” there are others on Council who would see $4.2 million of the money used to repurchase the vacant Y Lot next to the Blake Transit Center. There, Ackerman has suggested another 100 units of workforce housing could be built.
Yet, even the promise of $5 million for the city’s Affordable Housing Fund has not stopped hundreds of local business owners, the Main Street and State Street Area Associations, environmental activists and local elected officials from publicly criticizing the Core Space proposal. Over 5,000 registered voters in Ann Arbor signed a ballot proposal petition aimed at forcing Council members to bring the question of a sale of the Library Lot parcel to a public vote. The petition came up a few hundred signatures short of the number needed to put the question of the sale of the publicly-owned land to the city’s voters. A majority of Council members refused to put the question to voters.
Ward 1 Council member Sumi Kailasapathy (D) has called the Core Spaces proposal Ann Arbor’s “very own Trump Tower.”
Stephen Kunselman, who spoke before Council on Mar. 16 about the Core Spaces project said, “And now, if you really want to fund the affordable housing trust fund, then pass an ordinance requiring the city administrator to budget 10 percent of all parking revenues received by the city to the affordable housing trust fund.”
Ward 3 Council member Zach Ackerman (D), has repeatedly claimed adding 300 more units of high-rent, workforce apartment housing downtown will drive down rents. “We live in a supply-and-demand world, and by increasing supply to match that demand, you create competition,” said Zach Ackerman at a recent Council meeting. “Competition drives prices down.”
Ann Arbor resident Will Hathaway says Ackerman’s economic assertions “that adding 300 more units of housing for the wealthy will help to make housing more affordable is a harmful myth.”
Former County Commissioner Vivienne Armentrout is equally critical of the young Council member: “I wish Zach Ackerman would spend some more time studying the economics and financial tools for affordable housing before he makes these pronouncements.”
Let Them Eat Ribs
As the debate rages over the April 17 Council vote on whether to sell the Library Lot parcel, Brian Durrance said that homeless individuals affiliated with M.I.S.S.I.O.N. will attend a barbecue at City Hall scheduled for the afternoon of Monday April 17. After the free meal, which is being paid for by M.I.S.S.I.O.N. Board member Margaret (Peggy) Lynch, those same homeless individuals “will go into the City Council meeting and be present for the vote,” said Durrance.
In order to persuade M.I.S.S.I.O.N.’s Board members to agree to allow Council members to use homeless women and men as political pawns, Durrance said that M.I.S.S.I.O.N. leaders had a private sit-down with Ann Arbor CFO Tom Crawford about the Core Spaces proposal.
“In our private meeting, the CFO explained what the rents in the Library Lot development would be,” said Durrance.
When asked how Crawford could guarantee what the rents in the Core Spaces development would be since he works for the City of Ann Arbor and not the developer, Durrance admitted, “no one really knows what the rents will be.”
It’s no secret which City Council members support selling the library lot to Chicago developer Core Spaces for $10 million, and leasing the company 360 parking spaces in the Library lot underground parking garage for the next 50 years. To move forward with the sale requires the votes of eight City Council members and the votes are there: Frenzel (D-Ward 1), Westphal (D-Ward 2), Ackerman, Grand (D Ward 3), Krapohl (D-Ward 4), Smith (D-Ward 5), Warpehoski (D-Ward 5).
City Council members are open about their desire to spend the estimated $2 million in tax revenue the completed tower would bring into city coffers.
“We could get a few more cops with that money,” said Council member Jack Eaton (D-Ward 4). Be that as it may, Eaton points to the 50-year lease of hundreds of parking spaces in the Library Lot garage to Core Spaces as the deal breaker for him.
Conversely, Ward 3 Council member Julie Grand has called the Core Spaces project one “that can offer a lot of benefit without bringing cost to us as citizens.”
Grand’s suppositions may be true unless, of course, you happen to be a homeless citizen in Ann Arbor. For those homeless citizens who will stand silently in Council chambers on April 17 in an effort to deceive the public into believing even “the homeless” support the votes of the eight Council members who want to sell the Library Lot parcel and add to the stock of “unaffordable” workforce housing downtown, the cost of the Core Spaces project may just be their dignity.
The April 17 vote is only the first step in what will be a long process. Should Chris Taylor lose Zach Ackerman and Chip Smith’s votes (both of whom are opposed in the upcoming August 2017 primary election), Core Spaces may find itself without the necessary Council support to build anything atop the land they’d purchased. This is precisely what happened to local developer Dennis Dahlmann after he purchased the old Y lot for $5 million in 2014.
[…] Let Them Eat Barbecue: Council Members Plan to Use Homeless at Upcoming Meeting to Show “Stron… 10 comments […]
[…] Let Them Eat Barbecue: Council Members Plan to Use Homeless at Upcoming Meeting to Show “Stron… 205 views | 9 comments […]
With IRS auditors now at work during their 6-8 week audit of Ann Arbor’s use of the $49 million Build America Bonds, it is beyond reckless to proceed with any decision on the Core Spaces sale before the IRS audit is complete. A decision for Core Spaces followed by an identified problem based upon the audit would place the city in jeopardy of having to pay damages to Core Spaces.
I feel sad that again the homeless are being exploited to urge Council to approve yet another huge, high rent building downtown. Workforce housing is NOT low income housing, and the location does not have the needed stores and open space for livability. What this location DOES have is historic districts, that the developer caraefully omits from his drawings.
The obvious fact is that the homeless and low-income housing for these individuals who need it is going to be built in peripheral neighborhoods that are poorly connected to bus transit. Maple Road? I’m guessing it could easily take 45 minutes to get downtown from there on the bus. Taylor and his supporters on Council with their workforce housing baloney for downtown are pushing segregation.
I think this barbecue event is insulting. Throwing scraps for the peasants.
Hello Members of City Council,
Please think hard about that Core building.
Of course we all want development, but at what cost?
We have plenty of real estate left to put high rises on,
why not move ahead and let Core buy the to the old Y lot?
The price seems extremely suspect, 10 million? How much did that foundation/parking structure cost again, seriously we all need to know. Lets use that heavy duty super structure foundation to place a multi-level park with full size trees on the 3rd level, the Ross school of business moved the biggest tree ever, now lots put one up on the top of a park! Lets think outside of the box and not the in short view. Lets create a park that amazes people from Japan, to Sweden, why not? Not enough money you say? Then stop wasting it on sub-par contractors, killing deer, and train stations that we don’t need.
Chip and Chuck, you both have kids, so I honestly don’t understand why you both aren’t advocating
for any sort of outdoor rec area in the DDA footprint.
Have you been to the Millenium Park kids area in downtown Chicago?
If you haven’t, then I demand that council visit there before sacrificing this land of ours. That park is amazing, and its placed on some of the most prime real estate you could dream of.
I will buy your train tickets to see go see it if you have not, I am dead serious about this offer.
I realize that the plan is to recoup zillions in tax revenue, the easy way, from lodging the children of the 1% in overpriced condos while they get their degrees at UofM. But seriously, maybe we need to look at how we spend it rather then how we earn it. I am reminded of the Stadium bridge art, parking lot elevators, and underground fiber on 7th just to control stop light times. We need to reboot the budget.
The current political nightmare that we are living through is
further proof that we DESPERATELY need a public space to assemble,
protest, be head, seen, and be listened to by our elected officials.
You may say that the UofM Diag is the arena where these dialogues
need to be played out, but that is simply not the case.
The city and its tax paying population need to remain autonomous from the
university in some areas and this one is paramount.
Beyond the preservation of the public space that we need, there is
the specter of the scale of this building. Its simply too big, and requires too much parking.
The public access promised on the lower levels will most certainly not be used by
the public. I lived in Chicago for years, and I can assure you that this
sort of shady chasm created by vertical columns is not conducive to public utilization.
No one likes to huddle under a giant structure for relaxing and interacting unless its raining.
While I realize that arguing this point is a flawed and useless waste of my time, I just wanted to go on record to illustrate my disdain for this Core sale. Politically I probably don’t need to remind you that there is someone more organized than me running against Chip this year. The fact that over 5000 voters legitimately signed Alan Haber’s petition to put this sale into the people’s hands, not just city council’s should bear more weight than then seems to be understood.
I eagerly anticipate your responses.
Thanks,
Kevin Leeser and Family
817 Spring
734-358-0138
What Kevin said, and let me copy and paste one of my “3 questions” for council member Grand in response to her request for same. Please note that Ms. Grand did not reply to this tweet (as she requested) nor has she ever replied to any of my tweets, email or in-person questions. What’s your problem Julie? Too good to talk to us po’ folk if we don’t have anything to offer?
“To CM Grand:
You claim to care about the park system, and point to your service on PAC as an example of the good you have done for the city. The irony of someone who cares about parks yet will not entertain the idea of a downtown park is overwhelming.
Question #1: Where are you going to put our downtown park? Where are the children of downtown residents going to go and play? Where in walking distance is the park to serve the new dense downtown population you keep allowing? Since it has been proven that open space is necessary for economic, aesthetic and health reasons, will you guarantee the creation of a downtown park?”
Although I am in support of the project, and have indicated thusly in public many times, I’m not in support of using the homeless to create that project. They’re being used and that’s not right. This project will not benefit them as the rents will be high and it takes away the idea of a public park from them. It’s bewildering to me as to why they would want so much development. I also remember how Kunselman was trying to help out the homeless, yet they turned their back on him and worked at getting him removed from council. It’s incredibly sad and wrong as to how the homeless are used as political pawns in this town to benefit others and not them.
Ackerman needs to take a few more classes. Supply and Demand only works in a free market with no outside forces at play. To paraphrase an old physics joke punchline:
“It only works with a spherical house in a vacuum”
If the city council really cared about facilitating or providing Affordable Housing (they don’t) they could do any number of things around this Library Lot deal:
1. Reject the CORE proposal as inadequate in that bogus calculations were used to determine final FAR/building size, which resulted in 43 in stead of 100 units being required. Send them back to the drawing board to calculate the max building size properly.
2. Commit the property tax revenues from any project on top of Library Lot 100% to the Affordable Housing Fund in perpetuity. I have been told that after the DDA cap this would be around $500K/year available for the fund. I would prefer to exclude the DDA from any receipt of taxes for this lot, which would send almost $2million to the trust.
3. Create an annual city-wide goal of NEW construction of affordable housing, using the tax proceeds to purchase land, finance construction and maintain new construction. The idea that $5 million might go just to repair/refurbish without any new units being added is absurd. It’s called affordable housing for a reason, it’s not the greatest housing available. I doubt that any council members have surveyed the condition of free-market affordable housing in Ann Arbor. I have, and it isn’t pretty. The only upgrades that we should be spending public affordable-housing dollars on are those that effect the health, safety and welfare of the residents. Second round-improvements should be considered for environmental cost savings, such as weatherproofing and replacing appliances that are over 10 years old.
4. Create a much larger public parks space on the lot, and build our own affordable housing units in a low-rise around the perimeter of the lot. There are many nearby buildings that are a good example of the type of small floor plan, affordable units that would work on this site, without blocking the skyline. The first example that comes to mind is 307 Thompson Studios.
I could go on but you get the idea. There are many ways we can do better with this sale. The last thing we need to do is give a bunch of money to Avalon, who’s business model appears to be converting free-market affordable units into publicly-subsidized units, thereby diminishing the available supply of affordable housing. And as I have been saying for years, if city council really wanted to create affordable housing in Ann Arbor, they would stop building nothing but UNaffordable housing. The blame for this trend lies squarely at the feet of the DDA and it’s minions on council.